FTMO Free trial 100k 2 step Challenge

EURAUD SELL

Entry: 1.63909

SL: 1.64089

TP: 1.62612

Result: Stopped out for a loss — AUD news overnight spiked price through SL

Structure looked clean going into it, but AUD news overnight sent price spiking straight through my level. This is the risk of holding through news you don't control.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612 Result: Loss

No sugarcoating this one. EURAUD sell got stopped out because of an AUD news spike at night.

The technical read wasn't the problem — the timing was. Held a position through a session where volatility wasn't priced into my plan.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612

Sold EURAUD off a clean structural read. Overnight, AUD-related news hit and spiked price straight into my stop before any technical level could matter.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612

This is exactly why SL is non-negotiable — news doesn't respect chart structure, and I don't argue with it.

Every loss teaches something. This EURAUD sell is a reminder to check the economic calendar before holding size through the night session, especially on AUD/NZD pairs.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612

Technicals can be perfect and still get run over by a headline

The setup got invalidated by news, not by bad analysis — and the account absorbed it exactly as planned.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612 Result: Loss, but a controlled one

Fixed risk per trade means even a news-driven stop-out doesn't threaten anything beyond that single position.

You're holding a sell overnight and there's AUD (or any major) news scheduled before your session. Do you:

A) Close before the news and reassess after B) Tighten SL but stay in C) Hold as planned and let the stop do its job if it goes wrong

📍 Entry: 1.63909 | 🛑 SL: 1.64089 | 🎯 TP: 1.62612 — Result: Loss

Drop your approach below.

A loss caused by news isn't the same as a loss caused by a bad read. EURAUD sell followed the structure correctly — the market just got hit with a variable outside the chart.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612

Process stays intact. This one just goes in the "news risk" column.

Going back over this EURAUD sell — the setup was there, but I underweighted the risk of holding through the AUD news window overnight.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612

Going forward: check the calendar before holding size into low-liquidity, high-news hours, especially on AUD, NZD, and JPY-linked pairs.

Running total across pairs this week — some setups play out clean, others get disrupted by news. EURAUD sell falls into the second bucket.

📍 EURAUD — Entry: 1.63909 | SL: 1.64089 | TP: 1.62612 | Result: Loss (AUD news spike)

Same process, same risk discipline. Not every trade survives external noise, and that's priced into the plan

Result: loss. Cause: AUD news spike overnight. Risk: controlled, exactly as sized. Lesson: respect the economic calendar as much as the chart.

📍 Entry: 1.63909 🛑 SL: 1.64089 🎯 TP: 1.62612

GBPAUD SELL

Entry: 1.90937

SL: 1.91146

TP: 1.89765

Result: Stopped out for a loss — AUD news overnight reversed the move despite a clean liquidity sweep + BOS

GBPAUD sell — stopped out again ❌

Setup was clean: liquidity swept, structure broken below. Technically nothing wrong with the read. AUD news overnight is what took it south.

📍 Entry: 1.90937 🛑 SL: 1.91146 🎯 TP: 1.89765 Result: Loss

Second GBPAUD loss in a row, both tied to AUD news hitting while I'm holding a position overnight.

The chart gave me everything — sweep, BOS, clean structure. News doesn't care about any of that.

📍 Entry: 1.90937 🛑 SL: 1.91146 🎯 TP: 1.89765

My GBPAUD trade had approximately 5.6R potential.

Entry: 1.90937

SL: 1.91146

TP: 1.89765

Risking roughly 20.9 pips for 117.2 pips of potential.

The R:R was there.

But having good R:R doesn't mean the trade has to win.

One thing I'm learning to respect more:

Technical analysis doesn't exist in a vacuum.

I had the liquidity sweep.

I had the break of structure.

I had the bearish confirmation.

But AUD-related news entered the equation and pushed GBPAUD against the position.

Sometimes the market simply reminds you who's boss.

The worst thing I could do after this loss is say:

"My setup doesn't work."

No.

The setup worked according to my model.

The trade lost because the market produced an opposing catalyst.

There is a huge difference between a bad setup and a good setup that loses.

A losing trade doesn't automatically mean the analysis was wrong.

That's something every trader needs to understand.

If my model requires:

Liquidity sweep → MSS/BOS → displacement → entry

and those conditions occur, I take the trade according to my rules.

I don't need certainty.

I need consistency and controlled risk.

GBPAUD lesson of the day: Don't confuse outcome with process.

The outcome:

❌ SL hit.

The process:

✅ Liquidity swept

✅ Structure broken

✅ Bearish confirmation

✅ Defined entry

✅ Defined SL

✅ Defined TP

✅ Controlled risk

I can accept a loss when the process was respected.

This is why I don't want to become the trader who changes his strategy after every loss.

One loss → change strategy.

Another loss → change strategy again.

Eventually, you're not trading a system.

You're trading your emotions.

The goal is to build a model, execute it, collect data and improve it.